Teachers are ready to talk on insurance - But district vows to appeal ruling on multiple plans
A judge Friday ruled that the Buffalo School District must reinstate
multiple health insurance plans for teachers, but the head of the
teachers union promptly said he is open to talking -- as long as
raises are part of the negotiations.
Meanwhile, an angry Superintendent James A. Williams warned that
the decision upholding an arbitrator's award could trigger hundreds
of layoffs next fall.
The district suffered a stinging blow when State Supreme Court
Justice Patrick H. NeMoyer ruled he has no grounds to negate the
arbitration award. It requires the district to reinstate four health
insurance options and abandon a single-carrier plan that school
officials claim is saving $15 million a year.
Williams vowed to "vigorously appeal" the ruling, warning
that 300 teachers could be out of work in September if the district
loses its fight. Nonmandated programs, including Advanced Placement
classes, an alternative school and a new math and science school
would have to be eliminated, he added.
"This would be devastating," Williams said. "This
is all about the future of this community."
But Philip Rumore, head of the Buffalo Teachers Federation, said
any fallout from the long-festering insurance dispute falls at the
school district's doorstep. He said the Board of Education was wrong
to implement the single-insurer plan without negotiating with the
unions.
"What they did was wrong, and the district is still trying
to impose this on teachers," Rumore said as he left court.
He insisted the BTF has been willing to negotiate. When pressed,
he acknowledged that a pay increase and the resolution of several
other issues would have to be part of the equation. A state control
board imposed a wage freeze on all city and school employees in
April 2004.
Rumore disputed the school district's claim that not a single employee
has been adversely affected by the move to a single carrier. He
said some workers have had to wait longer to be reimbursed for out-of-pocket
medical expenses, and that they have more limited avenues for appealing
unsatisfactory decisions by BlueCross BlueShield, the lone carrier.
The executive director of the control board that oversees school
district finances expressed disappointment at the ruling.
"The judge's decision makes me question who is really winning
here," said Dorothy A. Johnson. "It's pretty clear that
it's not the students."
Johnson cited data showing that Buffalo schools are lagging behind
state standards in key testing areas. She echoed the views expressed
by other control board officials at a November meeting when they
cited the need to find ways to reduce the costs of fringe benefits
so more money can be channeled into classrooms.
"The students won't suffer because of anything the BTF has
done," Rumore retorted. "The students will suffer because
of the school district's blatant bullying on something they needed
to negotiate."
Rumore later added the union is also fighting the district's action
based on principle.
"History is filled with people who have trampled on people's
rights -- bullies who disregarded the law and tried to impose their
will upon others," he said.
NeMoyer ruled that except in limited instances, it is not a court's
role to substitute the judgment of an arbitrator. He disagreed with
the school district's claim that arbitrator Dana E. Eischen performed
no analysis of some issues that deemed integral to their case.
The arbitrator's award calls on the school district to reinstate
multiple health plans by Jan. 1. But Patricia A. Pancoe, the district's
executive director of labor relations, said the Board of Education
will be entitled to an automatic stay once it files papers seeking
an appeal.
The arbitrator's award also would require the district to rehire
-- with back pay and interest -- about two dozen teachers who were
laid off last year in the contentious insurance tug-of-war between
school officials and the union. Most teachers who were laid off
have already been reinstated.
|